In poetry competitions, prose always wins? Why, well the truth is prose is simple reflective thought and nothing more, prose, mere thought that any one can write. No skill or talent what so ever at all required other than a good imagination for telling a story

Rhyme has meter within, you can sing a perfectly metered poem just like a song. Poetry competition judges no not like rhyme as it takes to much time to check the meter (yet all they have to do is sing the poem in their head?). Prose pokes fun at genuine talent, and rips endless readers off. Alike modern art sadly, many times a child can sincerely do far better than poets writing prose?

Yet prose writers often get paid £5,000 (currently like $10,000 USA) for a 30 minute recital?

Poetry is the written word, you enjoy reading rhyme and seek out endless greeting cards with a rhyming verse in them, only a poet reading prose live can make it sound any actual sense by adding verbal role play much like acting.

A beautiful quote is better an apt name for prose prose is NOT poetry it′s simply writing a short story or quote?

A poet is an artist painting vivid images in a readers mind using mere words alone as paint and the mind as a canvas?

Which is better at the end of a day, which paints a clearer vivid image in a readers mind which has more appeal?

We already know many of our poems are not perfect meter?